Why Chewanisation is irresistible

Chewanisation, Chewalisation or Chewafication loosely describe the cultural dominance of the Chewa in Malawi, especially through language. Intellectual resistance has existed, but with little visible impact. Its roots lie in the early post-independence period.

For nation-building purposes, Malawi adopted chiChewa as the national language in 1968, alongside English as the official language. This policy decision marked a turning point, elevating one language and its cultural framework above others. Even after the fall of Hastings Kamuzu Banda more than three decades ago—who was often accused of imposing his language—the cultural influence associated with chiChewa has continued to expand.

If current trends persist, one could argue that in the long term, other languages risk being reduced to names and structural remnants, with much of their vocabulary replaced. To understand how this happened, one must look at the education system. In early colonial and missionary schooling in Nyasaland, instruction was conducted in local languages.

[paywall]

Pupils learned in chiYao, chiTonga, chiTumbuka and others, allowing them to grasp concepts within familiar cultural contexts. A child in Mangochi learned in chiYao; one in Tongaland learned in chiTonga. This approach supported both comprehension and cultural continuity.

However, changes began before and shortly after independence. In the Northern Region, for example, instruction shifted toward chiTumbuka. Then, between 1964 and 1968, a more sweeping change occurred: chiChewa replaced ciNyanja (as it was then spelled) as the dominant language of instruction.

Even orthography shifted, from “ci” to “chi.” Beyond language, cultural content followed. School curricula, especially at Malawi Certificate of Education (MCE) level, included chiChewa literature such as Kukula ndi Mwambo and Maliro ndi Miyambo ya aChewa. These texts presented Chewa customs as normative, encouraging learners across the country to internalise them.

This was not enforced through overt coercion, but through routine education. The Italian thinker Antonio Gramsci, in Prison Notebooks, described this process as cultural hegemony: dominance achieved gradually until it is accepted as natural. No force is required; people adopt and reproduce the system themselves.

Later, Louis Althusser, in On the Reproduction of Capitalism, expanded this idea by identifying two mechanisms: Repressive State Apparatuses (RSAs) and Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs). RSAs—such as the police, courts and military—enforce order directly. ISAs—such as schools, churches, media and families—shape beliefs, values and norms more subtly.

In Malawi’s case, education has functioned as a powerful ISA. Over time, it has normalised chiChewa not just as a language, but as a cultural reference point. Even without compulsion, its influence has deepened.

Today, chiChewa literature is no longer imposed in the same way, yet the language itself dominates daily communication. Its vocabulary continues to filter into other languages. For example, Tonga now includes words like kadzidzi (owl), agogo (grandparent) and atsikana (girls), which sound local but originate from chiChewa.

This blending raises questions about the future of linguistic diversity. The shift is also evident in social interactions. Groups composed entirely of Yao, Tumbuka, Sena or Lhomwe speakers often default to chiChewa in conversation, despite having cultural associations such as Ndamo sya Yao, M’gumano wa Sena or Mulhakho wa Lhomwe aimed at preserving identity.

Cultural dominance rarely announces itself; it spreads quietly, through everyday practice. In that sense, Chewanisation is not a future possibility but a present reality—sustained not by force, but by widespread, often unconscious, acceptance.

[/paywall]