I have lived with diabetes for over three decades. I went to school in Zambia, including Nkhwazi School, at a time when non-communicable diseases were rarely discussed in classrooms and never formally planned for. When a system does not name a problem, it does not disappear.
It relocates. In the absence of policy, procedure, or shared understanding, responsibility quietly shifts downward. In schools, it often lands on children.
In my case, the system worked through people rather than policy. My mother explained my condition to teachers because there was nothing written down for them to refer to. There were no school guidelines, no standard procedures, no shared explanation for classmates.
[paywall]
Everything depended on memory, goodwill, and constant reinforcement. One of my earliest memories captures this more clearly than any statistic could. I had biscuits that were safe for me to eat, carefully packed because there were no diabetic alternatives at the tuck shop.
A friend sneezed on them and did not seem to care. Those biscuits were no longer usable, and there were no replacements. What stayed with me was not just the inconvenience, but the realisation that my needs were fragile and easily disrupted, even among friends.
I learned early that I had to protect myself, because no system would do it for me. This experience is not unique, and it is not accidental. Just this week, I spoke to a fellow diabetic parent whose child had a painful experience at school that grew out of misunderstanding rather than cruelty.
A health condition was used to dismiss her, and the situation escalated quickly, leaving everyone upset. What struck me was how easily the moment could have been avoided if there had been shared understanding, not just between children, but within the school itself. That kind of gap does not come from individual failure.
It comes from systems that have not yet been built. Zambia does not currently have accurate national data on non-communicable diseases, and that absence matters. What is not measured cannot be planned for.
What cannot be planned for cannot be standardised. Schools cannot design policies around numbers they do not have, or conditions that remain undercounted, underfunded, and often unnamed. Teachers cannot be trained for realities that sit outside the data.
The result is not negligence, but silence. In that silence, children with health conditions often become their own managers. They learn to monitor their bodies while monitoring the room.
They learn when to ask for help and when to stay quiet. They learn how much attention feels acceptable and when their needs begin to feel like a disruption. Alongside managing blood sugar levels, sensory overload, seizures, medication, or fatigue, they are also managing perception.
This is the invisible load. It is cognitive, emotional, and physical, and it is rarely acknowledged because it does not interrupt the timetable. Children who carry this load well are often praised for being responsible or mature.
What goes unnoticed is the lesson being absorbed beneath the praise. Safety depends on self-control. Belonging depends on minimising inconvenience.
Care must be negotiated rather than assumed. These lessons do not end at the school gate. They settle into the body and resurface years later in how adults relate to rest, illness, and support.
The classroom itself is not a neutral space. It is a social ecosystem. Other children notice difference immediately.
They notice when one child eats during lessons, leaves the room regularly, or receives additional adult attention. Without explanation, these differences feel confusing. Children are deeply sensitive to fairness, but fairness without context feels broken.When there is no shared language, children create their own explanations.
Sometimes those explanations turn into resentment. Sometimes teasing. Sometimes indifference.
Not because children are unkind by nature, but because silence invites misunderstanding. In this way, the lack of explanation does not only affect the child with the health condition. It quietly reshapes peer relationships and the emotional climate of the classroom.
It is important to say this clearly. This is not about blaming schools or teachers. In Zambia, educators are working within a system that does not yet have the data, funding, or infrastructure to fully support NCD management in schools.
Without national standards, responses are improvised. Parents step in where they can. Teachers do their best with limited guidance.
Children adapt.Zambians in the diaspora may assume that better resourced systems prevent these experiences entirely. Yet many will recognise the pattern. In the UK, the US, Australia, or the Gulf, policies may exist on paper, but implementation varies.
Teachers may have guidelines but lack confidence explaining conditions to a class. Social misunderstanding still occurs. The invisible load may be lighter, but it has not disappeared.
The long term effects of this early responsibility are rarely traced back to school, yet they often begin there. Adults who grew up managing chronic conditions frequently struggle to rest without guilt, delay seeking medical care, or feel pressure to appear capable even when unwell. They are praised for resilience while quietly managing exhaustion.
[/paywall]
