After months of conversations with people who live from the sea – or livewiththe consequences of how it’s managed – one thing is clear: SA’s fishing industry is not a single story. It’s a web of competing realities, bound together by a shared dependence on a finite, living resource. From industrial trawlers to hand-line fishers, from scientists modelling biomass to officials trying to enforce the law with thinning budgets, everyone is working on the same ocean, but from very different angles.
What follows is not a verdict, but a synthesis: what we’ve learned by listening across the spectrum, where the real sticking points lie, whathasworked and where there’s genuine room for optimism about the future. One of the most important lessons is that SAdoeshave a fisheries management system that works – at least on paper. The country pioneered sophisticated, science-based approaches to setting catch limits, particularly through feedback-driven management procedures that adjust Total Allowable Catches (TACs) in response to changing stock indicators.
Internationally, South African fisheries science is still highly respected, especially in sectors like hake, where long-term management has prevented collapse and enabled recovery. This counters a common perception that “there’s no plan”. Thereisa plan.
Read Full Article on Daily Maverick
[paywall]
The real problem is consistency: keeping the machinery running year after year, through political churn, fiscal pressure and environmental volatility. That inconsistency is felt most acutely when science falters, not because the models are wrong, but because the inputs are compromised. Delayed or missed research surveys – often resulting from an ageing research vessel and budget bottlenecks – force scientists to apply precautionary cuts.
Those cuts may protect fish stocks, but they also shut factories early, leave boats idle and send seasonal workers home months before schedule. Conservation succeeds, but livelihoods absorb the shock. A second, recurring theme is mismatch.
Fish populations are dynamic – especially small pelagic species like sardine and anchovy, which respond quickly to climate shifts, currents and plankton blooms. Businesses and communities, however, need predictability. Large, vertically integrated companies can usually absorb volatility.
They diversify species, add value through processing and ride out bad seasons. For them, quotas – however imperfect – are the only defence against a free-for-all that would destroy the resource for everyone. Smaller operators sit in a more precarious position.
Medium-sized canneries and independent vessels often live season to season. When allocations are halved because of delayed surveys, the consequences are immediate and local: closed plants, lost wages, hollowed-out coastal towns.
[/paywall]
