The challenge is not the technology itself, but the intent behind its use. In the hands of democratic governments, AI can be a tool for inclusion. In the hands of autocrats, it becomes a tool for exclusion.
The future of civic space in Africa will depend on how these technologies are regulated, who controls them and whose interests they serve. In 2025, Africa stands at a crossroads. On one hand, the continent is experiencing a digital renaissance, an explosion of connectivity, innovation, and youth-led activism powered by artificial intelligence, machine learning, and the Internet of Things.
On the other hand, a quiet but insidious war is being waged against political expression, dissent, and the free flow of information. This war is not fought with guns alone, but with firewalls, surveillance software, and the monopolisation of airwaves. It is a war against pluralism, against the right to know, and against the very soul of democratic accountability.
Read Full Article on Daily Maverick
[paywall]
Across much of Africa, traditional media, radio, television and print remain tightly controlled by the state. National broadcasters dominate the airwaves, especially in rural areas where radio is still the most accessible medium. In countries like Rwanda, Eritrea, Sudan, Cameroon, Egypt and Zimbabwe, the state’s grip on information is justified in the name of national unity, security, or development.
But beneath these noble veneers lies a darker truth: the deliberate suppression of dissent, the silencing of opposition, and the manipulation of public perception. In Eritrea, where independent media is virtually non-existent, the government maintains a monopoly on truth. In Rwanda, the narrative of post-genocide unity has been weaponised to stifle criticism.
In Sudan and Cameroon, ongoing conflicts provide a pretext for information blackouts. Egypt’s regime, under the guise of anti-terrorism, has jailed journalists and censored online platforms. Zimbabwe’s state broadcaster remains a mouthpiece for the ruling party, while opposition voices are relegated to the margins.
These regimes operate within a framework of electoral autocracy, where elections exist but are neither free nor fair. The control of information is central to this model. These shutdowns are often justified as measures to prevent violence or misinformation.
But in truth, they are acts of repression, frivolous and futile attempts to halt the inevitable march of the digital revolution. With innovations like Starlink bringing high-speed internet to even the most remote corners of the continent, the state’s ability to control the digital frontier is waning. Yet, instead of embracing this transformation, many regimes are doubling down on censorship, surveillance, and intimidation.
In this hostile environment, a new figure has emerged: the citizen journalist. Armed with just a smartphone and an internet connection, this fearless, brazen and unbound individual is reshaping the African civic space. They are not beholden to institutions or editorial boards.
They report in real time, from the streets, the villages, the refugee camps. They document police brutality, electoral fraud and social injustice. And they do so with a clarity and urgency that traditional media cannot match.
These digital warriors are often young, tech-savvy and politically conscious. They are the children of the revolution, born into repression but raised on resistance. Their tools are hashtags, livestreams and viral videos.
Their battlegrounds are Twitter threads and WhatsApp groups. And their victories are measured not in votes, but in visibility. Each of these movements faced backlash, arrests, internet shutdowns and smear campaigns.
But they also left legacies. They changed laws, shifted narratives, and inspired new generations of activists. They proved that digital tools could be used not just for entertainment, but for emancipation.
[/paywall]
