He insisted that nature deserves protectionbecause it exists, not because it’s useful to us.Each being is an end in itself. Imagine a Norwegian philosopher perched high on a mountain ledge, squinting into the wind, not in conflict with it’s icy bite but in conversation with it. This isArne Næss, father ofdeep ecology, mountaineer, thinker and occasional wordsmith.
He wasn’t the kind of philosopher who dusted his sleeves in ivory towers. Rather, he rappelled down rock faces, paused mid-climb to ponder the rights of moss, and then descended to write about the moral significance of rivers. His philosophy was not only written on paper but tested against stone and silence.
Deep ecology, as he coined it, insists the world is not merely a warehouse for human use. Every entity – be it a frog, a fungus or a fjord – has intrinsic value, independent of its usefulness toHomo sapiens. That sounds lofty, perhaps austere, but in Næss’ telling it often came with a twinkle in the eye.
Read Full Article on Daily Maverick
[paywall]
He was not in the business of ecological gloom; he loved play, humour and paradox, even as he urged a radical rethinking of our place in the natural world. In 1973, Næssdistinguishedbetween ‘shallow’ and ‘deep’ ecology. The shallow kind is anthropocentric: protect forests because they provide lumber or clean air, protect whales because tourists like them.
Deep ecology, on the other hand, insists nature deserves protectionbecause it exists.A river’s dignity doesn’t hinge on our thirst; the owl isn’t just a rodent-control device. Each being is an end in itself. This distinction was radical.
Environmental movements in the 1970s were mostly about pollution, recreation or resource management. Næss came along like a friendly philosopher-elf, saying: “That’s nice, but it’s not enough. You’ve got to go deeper.” Næss coined‘ecosophy’(ecological wisdom) for his personal guiding philosophy.
His ecosophy, sometimes calledEcosophy T(after his mountain hut, Tvergastein), was his attempt to live in accordance with ecological principles. He grew vegetables, built his cabin high in the mountains and pared his life down to essentials. His ecosophy said: That last point was perhaps his most playful.
For Næss, the “ecological self” is expansive. You don’t just identify with your own skin and bones, but with ecosystems. Hurt a river and you are, in some sense, hurting yourself.
With George Sessions, Næss distilled deep ecology intoeight principles: The genius lies in how they blend moral seriousness with Scandinavian pragmatism. They’re not commandments but provocations, designed to make us rethink.
[/paywall]
