Municipal bylaws needed to protect rural communities and areas affected by sand mining

Large trucks move in and out of rural communities daily, extracting sand with very little for local people to show in terms of tangible benefits. Sand is a public resource, and its benefits should ideally flow back to the communities where it is extracted, whether through corporate social responsibility initiatives, community trusts, structured benefit‑sharing models or by creating employment opportunities for local residents. However, an important question arises, do such models exist in practice, and are communities truly aware of how they work?

Equally important is the blurred line between private-sector sand miners and community members who participate in sand extraction. When large private mining companies or individuals extract sand “for free” from rivers yet sell it at high prices, are they selling the sand itself or charging for transportation and related costs? In many localities, the number of sand‑laden trucks moving in and out of villages increases daily as local entrepreneurs supply sand for residential construction, such as house building and plastering, in response to local demand.

In contrast, large private companies extract sand in rural communities primarily for bulk stockpiling in urban centres. Once the sand reaches resale points in towns and cities, its price is dramatically inflated, despite having been extracted free of charge from rural areas. While some mining companies do go through the formal process to obtain mining rights which come with legally binding obligations to support affected communities, the question remains, do communities fully understand the responsibilities that mining companies have towards them?

[paywall]

And more importantly, do these companies honour their commitments? Oversight is often limited, especially when applications for mining rights exclude the involvement of local authorities. Municipalities, in an attempt to play a role in sand mining, particularly in rural areas, require careful navigation of complex governance relationships with traditional leaders, customary land tenure systems, community expectations and the distinct responsibilities of sector departments.

[/paywall]