Zimbabwe News Update

🇿🇼 Published: 02 February 2026
📘 Source: 263Chat

The High Court has upheld an application for referral to the Constitutional Court for a Harare woman who was arrested on allegations of deliberately infecting her boyfriend with HIV three years ago. The woman (name withheld) was arrested on 31 March 2022 and was placed on remand at Rotten Row Magistrates’ Court after being charged with deliberate transmission of HIV. It is the State’s case that, during the period extending from March 2021 to November 2021 at Phase 6 Eastview, the woman unlawfully infected the complainant with HIV knowing that she was infected with the virus or realising that there was a real risk or possibility of such transmission.

Following the commencement of the Marriages Act [Chapter 5:15] on 27 May 2022, section 79 of the Criminal Law Code—the provision under which the applicant was charged was repealed. Consequently, on 2 August 2022 the woman, who is represented by Paidamoyo Bryne Saurombe sought to quash the charges. She argued that, per section 70(1)(l) of the Constitution, she cannot be lawfully convicted of an act that no longer constitutes a criminal offence.

Despite a lower court ruling that the Interpretation Act permits such trials to continue, the woman approached the court seeking a Constitutional Court referral to determine if her rights are being violated by a prosecution based on a defunct law. Magistrate Taurai Manuwere dismissed the referral application as “frivolous and vexatious,” noting the accused had not led oral evidence and that the Constitutional Court had already decided on section 70(k) rights of an accused person. He then dismissed the application on those grounds, a decision the woman sought a review at the High Court.

📖 Continue Reading
This is a preview of the full article. To read the complete story, click the button below.

Read Full Article on 263Chat

AllZimNews aggregates content from various trusted sources to keep you informed.

[paywall]

In his judgement, High Court judge Justice Maxwell Takuva said the lower court erred by requiring oral evidence for a referral based solely on law and agreed facts. He added that the lower court committed a gross procedural irregularity by ruling on the merits after declaring the application “defective.”

[/paywall]

📰 Article Attribution
Originally published by 263Chat • February 02, 2026

Powered by
AllZimNews

All Zim News – Bringing you the latest news and updates.

By Hope