Harrington Considers Legal Action Over Mwila’s Racial Remarks on Lubinda LUSAKA — Former Tourism Minister William Harrington has begun consulting legal counsel on the possibility of filing a criminal complaint against former Patriotic Front secretary general Davies Mwila over televised remarks questioning acting PF president Given Lubinda’s eligibility for office on racial grounds. The comments made by Mwila, broadcast nationally and widely circulated online, have drawn swift condemnation from political, religious, and civic leaders across Zambia. Harrington described Mwila’s statements as “hateful, offensive, and incompatible with constitutional principles on citizenship.” He emphasized that the 2016 constitutional amendments explicitly removed the parentage clause, affirming that any Zambian citizen holding a green national registration card is eligible to run for president, irrespective of race or ancestry.
“To suggest otherwise is to deny the letter and spirit of our Constitution,” Harrington said about Mwila. The remarks surfaced amid intensifying leadership struggles within the Patriotic Front, which has seen multiple figures declare interest in the party presidency. Analysts note that while internal rivalries have produced sharp exchanges, Mwila’s racial framing marked a significant departure from accepted political discourse.
“Political competition does not justify rhetoric that undermines the foundational principle of equal citizenship,” Harrington said. Public reaction was immediate and unified. Editorials, church leaders, civil society organisations, and opposition figures issued statements condemning the comments as dangerous to national unity.
Read Full Article on Lusaka Times
[paywall]
Media outlets described the remarks as “reprehensible” and “a betrayal of Zambia’s anti racial legacy.” Commentators recalled that Zambia’s independence movement explicitly rejected racial hierarchy, and that post independence governance has sought to uphold an inclusive national identity. Harrington stressed that his potential complaint is not motivated by partisan interests but by a duty to protect constitutional values. “The aim is not personal retaliation but to reinforce that public influence carries responsibility,” he said.
He warned that failing to challenge such rhetoric could embolden others to use divisive language in future electoral contests. Zambia’s legal framework includes provisions against hate speech and discriminatory incitement. Harrington argued these laws are not symbolic but serve to safeguard public dignity and social cohesion. If a case proceeds, legal observers say it could clarify the boundaries of lawful political speech and test the judiciary’s willingness to enforce anti discrimination statutes.
[/paywall]
