THE growing debate around why Queen Nadia TV’s X-rated content should not be allowed on Facebook speaks to broader concerns about digital responsibility, platform standards, and the impact of online media on society. In this context, calls to bar Queen Nadia TV from Facebook are rooted not in hostility towards free expression, but due to concerns over public safety, dignity, and even the platform’s own integrity. Critics argue that Queen Nadia TV relies on pornographic material to attract views and engagement.
We all agree that pornographic material should not be allowed on Facebook because the platform is designed to be a general, public social space used by people of all ages, cultures, and backgrounds. Unlike adult-only websites that require age verification and intentional access, Facebook is easily accessible to minors. Allowing explicit sexual content would expose children and young people to material that is inappropriate for their age, potentially harming their psychological, emotional, and moral development.
Protecting minors alone is a strong and sufficient reason for maintaining strict restrictions on pornography. Another important reason is consent and dignity. Pornography also undermines the quality and purpose of social interaction on Facebook.
[paywall]
Introducing explicit sexual content shifts the environment towards objectification and distraction, making it unsafe and uncomfortable for many users. There are also cultural considerations. Many societies, especially here in Africa, hold strong values around decency and public morality.
Facebook operates globally and must respect diverse cultural norms and national laws, some of which strictly prohibit the public distribution of pornographic material. Allowing such content could place the platform in conflict with local regulations and community standards. Banning pornographic material on Facebook is not about censorship but about responsibility.
[/paywall]
All Zim News – Bringing you the latest news and updates.
