This has sparked an important national conversation about accountability, digital ethics, and the responsibilities that come with influence on the online space. Malloti’s conduct is, therefore, being widely condemned not simply as a personal lapse, but as behaviour that reflects a broader problem of declining standards in online discourse. When influential individuals engage in such behaviour, it sends a dangerous message, especially to young people, that aggression and insult are acceptable forms of expression.
The outrage is also rooted in expectations of leadership and responsibility. Public figures, artists, influencers, and commentators occupy positions of visibility and influence. While they are entitled to freedom of expression, that freedom comes with a duty to exercise restraint and respect.
Foul language, particularly when directed at individuals or groups, crosses the line from expression into abuse. It undermines public dialogue and distracts from meaningful engagement on social, political, or cultural issues. Beyond moral condemnation, the situation raises questions about the role of authorities and regulators.
[paywall]
Zimbabwe already has laws that address abusive communication, harassment, and the misuse of digital platforms. Authorities could begin by consistently enforcing existing cyber laws to deter repeat offenses. Clear consequences—such as fines, warnings, or mandatory apologies—would send a strong signal that online spaces are not lawless zones where anything goes.
Platforms like Facebook, X, and TikTok have community standards that prohibit hate speech, harassment, and abusive language. Authorities can encourage or formally request stricter enforcement of these standards against repeat offenders, including temporary suspensions or content removal where necessary.
[/paywall]
All Zim News – Bringing you the latest news and updates.
