It was a celebration that prepared the next batch of protectors of the village, it was deeply spiritual — marking a young man’s transition into responsibility, restraint, and service to family and community. Its authority lay not precisely in celebration, but in instruction; not in display, but in discipline. Yet in recent years, an uncomfortable shift has taken root: initiation is increasingly becoming a mirror of income, status, and political proximity rather than a reaffirmation of cultural values.
What makes this shift especially dangerous is that it is not producing one uniform distortion; it is producing two distortions that track class lines. On one side, upper-income households increasingly stage reintegration as a public exhibition — lavish tents, designer outfits, luxury vehicles, high-profile catering and event-style homecomings that turn a sacred conclusion into a social showcase of “what are you wearing?” On the other side, lower- and middle-income households — often under financial pressure, constrained by distance, bullying and intimidation — end up having their sons exposed to illegal or poorly regulated initiation schools. In effect, the rite is being pulled apart: the wealthy risk hollowing it out through spectacle, while the poor and middle classes risk losing lives through unsafe, unlawful practice.
Both trends are corrosive. One distorts the meaning; the other destroys the body of the process. This raises an unavoidable question: is the growing opulence a reflection of the new political and economic dispensation — or a distortion of the custom under it?
Read Full Article on Daily Dispatch
[paywall]
SA’s post-1994 landscape has produced new access, new elites, and new forms of visibility. In many respects, this has corrected historical exclusion and expanded opportunity.
[/paywall]
