BUSANI NGCAWENI | The Middle East war is breaking the Gulf city states’ bubble of protection

With Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu’swaragainst Iran, driven by hatred, continuing in the Middle East, the city state model, a bubble built on security guarantees and fossil fuel wealth, is being tested. What had been constructed as a stable balance is now showing strain. For decades, Gulf city states have substituted regional integration with distant alliances, anchoring their security in American military presence rather than neighbourhood peace and stability.

That arrangement is now reaching its limits. Protection that depends on a superpower is contingent, and contingency becomes visible the moment that superpower is engaged elsewhere or recalibrating its priorities. This is not new.

External guarantees tend to hold in periods of relative calm, but they become unreliable in moments of escalation such as in this US-Israel war of aggression against Iran. As tensions with Iran intensify, the presence of foreign military infrastructure in places like Qatar, the UAE and Bahrain has shifted from deterrent to target. Hosting power invites projection, and projection invites retaliation.

[paywall]

Saudi Arabia, positioning itself as a regional power with deep ties to the US, has also been drawn into the risk perimeter. Retaliatory bombs have landed in her territory. Iran’s response, framed as resistance to US andIsraeliaggression, is altering the geography of risk.

Conflict is no longer contained within bilateral lines. It is diffusing across the Gulf, drawing in states that had positioned themselves as insulated nodes of capital and logistics. The very proximity that once enabled economic advantage is now generating strategic exposure to precision strikes.

This exposure forces a reassessment. Gulf states face a narrowing set of choices. They can deepen alignment with external powers and accept heightened risk, or they can move toward regional accommodation and strategic neutrality.

Oman’s position offers one model, not because it resolves conflict, but because it reduces entanglement. What once functioned as protection is now becoming exposure. The economic dimension reinforces the same pattern.

Oil markets are tightening as supply routes are disrupted and tanker movement is constrained. Prices are rising, but this reflects scarcity and instability rather than strength. City state revenues are becoming more volatile as export flows face interruption and insurance costs escalate.

What appears as short term gain carries fragility in the long term. Infrastructure risk compounds this instability. The threat to airports, hotels and other civilian infrastructure, alongside communications and military assets, including facilities linked to Al Udeid, signals that the bubbles of prosperity are within reach and cannot dependent on US air defence systems.

[/paywall]