Institutional misalignments, perceived contractual uncertainty, and statutory inconsistencies all require a rapid government response.
MMCZ valuation is based on MMCZ Act Section 3(1)(e) [Chapter 21:06], which requires the corporation to determine mineral value at the “point of extraction” (also known as mine-gate price).
With this approach, expenses, including marketing, insurance, and transportation that come after extraction, are specifically not included in royalty estimates.
By acknowledging and preserving contractually agreed pricing structures, Section 243 of the Mines and Minerals Act [Chapter 21:05] further strengthens this model.
The application of mine-gate valuations in legacy agreements was upheld by the court inZimbabwe Platinum Mines(Pvt) Ltd vZIMRA(2015), confirming their contractual sanctity and indicating regulatory stability for current operators.
This decision provided early judicial support for the legality of this approach.
In contrast, ZIMRA bases its royalty calculation on “gross fair market value,” which is required by Section 37B(c) of the Finance Act [Chapter 23:04].
This approach is in line with the Mines and Minerals Act’s Section 251(2), which states that royalties are calculated as a percentage of “proceeds received. ” The fundamental distinction is that all post-extraction expenses are included to maximise economic value at the point of sale.
ZIMRA’s interpretation is reinforced by Section 34 of the Revenue Authority Act [Chapter 23:11], which penalises under-declaration of revenue, and Statutory Instrument 26/2025 (Royalty Compliance Regulations), which empowers the authority to reassess revenue due retroactively.
This demonstrates a clear legislative and regulatory intent to increase the royalty base and enjoy the full financial benefits of Zimbabwe’s mineral riches sale. 3.
Judicial Interpretation: Precedential Risks
The judicial landscape exacerbates an already complex legal terrain, with recent Supreme and High Court decisions offering clarity in one aspect but bringing new forms of doubt in another.
InAfrochine Smelting (Pvt) Ltdv ZIMRA (2023), a shift in principle by the Supreme Court ruling was a substantial divergence from the priorZimplatsstandard procedure.
The court determined that “gross fair market value” refers to the arm’s-length transaction price realised at the ultimate point of sale.
Importantly, it virtually eliminated the deductibility of post-extraction expenses, including transportation and insurance.
From a legal and statutory basis, this decision looks well-reasoned and consistent with a global trend towards strong transfer price enforcement.
By adopting valuation based on final sale prices and expressly following OECD arm’s length criteria, the Supreme Court supported ZIMRA’s view that taxes should be assessed on the true economic value of mineral sales rather than potentially understated pricing.
The rejection of the MMCZ’s price standard may derive from the judiciary’s conclusion that fiscal legislation transcends, or at least provides a different foundation for, valuation than marketing regulations, especially if transfer pricing issues are paramount.
This judicial approach aligns Zimbabwe’s tax administration with international best practices for reducing illicit financial flows and guaranteeing equitable taxation of resource wealth.
The subsequent High Court ruling in ZIMRA versus Murowa Diamonds (2024) confirmed this trajectory by connecting royalties to the entire operating income produced from mining sales, therefore upholding the gross sales strategy.
These recent judicial declarations substantially support ZIMRA’s interpretation, emphasising the notion that royalties should represent the actual revenue generated by natural resources.
In the landmark decision ofZIMASCO (Private) Limited v.
Commissioner General of the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority(2024), the court asserted that it was both incorrect and illegal to subtract distribution or auxiliary charges from the gross selling price under the current tax regime.
The judgment highlights the ongoing complexities surrounding the interpretation and implementation of tax legislation in the extractive industry, highlighting the importance of specific legislative definitions under mining law. 🔗 Read Full Article
All Zim News is a central hub for all things Zimbabwean, curating news from across the country so no story is missed.
Alongside aggregation, our team of nationwide reporters provides real-time, on-the-ground coverage.
Stay informed and connected — reach us at admin@allzimnews. com.
