Watch Video5 things the Madlanga Commission exposed about the case against Dineo Mokwele

The Madlanga Commission has heard allegations that the Investigating Directorate Against Corruption exceeded its legal mandate by pursuing investigations, arrests and court action against senior SAPS leaders, intensifying scrutiny of the unit’s powers and oversight. Madlanga Commission this week has torn into what increasingly appears to be an unreal criminal case against SAPS Brigadier Dineo Mokwele, exposing glaring holes in the investigation and raising questions about how corruption charges were pursued in the first place. In hours of tense testimony, commissioners dismantled key aspects of the investigation, challenged the legal basis for the criminal case and forced extraordinary concessions from the head of theInvestigating Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC), Advocate Andrea Johnson.

Mokwele was appointed in April 2024 to lead SAPS Crime Intelligence’s Technical Support Services unit after joining the organisation from the private sector. An engineer by profession, she previously worked at BMW and holds an industrial engineering degree, a diploma in mechatronics and 12 additional qualifications that the commission heard matched the technical demands of the post. Yet she now faces fraud and corruption charges after investigatorsalleged she lacked the policing background required for the position.

This is a unit that Lieutenant General Dumisani Khumalo leads. Commissioners openly questioned that reasoning, pointing out that SAPS regularly recruits specialists from outside the police service and asking what evidence transformed an employment dispute into a criminal prosecution. The commission’s toughest exchanges came during evidence from lead investigator Brian Padayachee, who conceded that part of the alleged criminal benefit linked to Mokwele’s appointment would only arise in the future.

[paywall]

That admission triggered immediate scrutiny, withcommissioners questioning how investigators could justify arrestingsomeone for an alleged benefit they accepted had not yet materialised. The commission also heard that an internal SAPS legal opinion had reportedly concluded that the allegations were too vague to support criminal prosecution, adding to growing concerns over the strength of the case.

[/paywall]