People’s Summit Rejects Constitutional Amendment Bill, Demands Referendum

A coalition of civic groups, labour unions, students, faith organisations, war veterans and community activists has rejected Zimbabwe’s proposed Constitutional Amendment (No. 3) Bill (CAB3) describing it as a threat to democracy and calling for a national referendum on the proposed changes. The position was outlined in a communiqué issued after a People’s Summit held in Harare on Saturday, where participants said they had gathered to deliberate on the implications of the constitutional amendment bill for the country’s future.

In a statement, delegates declared “We, the people, reject CAB3 in its current form because it threatens constitutional democracy, accountable governance, the separation of powers, gender equality, and the democratic gains secured through decades of struggle and sacrifice.” The summit brought together workers, civil servants, students, women, youth groups, informal traders, constitutional advocates, church representatives, professionals and members of the Zimbabwean diaspora. Participants argued that the Constitution represented the collective will of Zimbabweans and should not be altered without broad public participation. “Our Constitution is more than a legal document.

It is our national covenant, forged through sacrifice, struggle, dialogue, and hope,” the communiqué said. A central demand emerging from the summit was that any constitutional changes should be subjected to a national referendum. The gathering criticised Parliament’s public consultation process on CAB3 alleging that hearings were characterised by intimidation and violence. “If there exists genuine confidence that the proposed amendments enjoy overwhelming public support, then the most democratic path remains clear – allow the people themselves to decide through a free and fair national referendum,” the communiqué said Delegates also disputed official claims regarding public submissions on the bill saying citizens deserved a constitutional process that genuinely reflected public opinion.