ERC flags irregularities at constitutional amendment hearings

The Election Resource Centre Africa (ERC) has flagged irregularities in the ongoing public hearings on the Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment Bill (No. 3), raising concerns over fairness, transparency and equal access to the consultation process. The hearings, which commenced across Zimbabwe on March 30 and are set to run until April 2, 2026, are part of parliament’s constitutional obligation to gather public input on proposed amendments.

The public consultation process is a critical stage in the country’s democratic framework, offering citizens an opportunity to directly participate in shaping constitutional reforms. However, ERC Africa, which has deployed observers nationwide to monitor proceedings, says the conduct of some hearings falls short of expected democratic standards. In a statement, the organisation noted that meaningful public participation requires that citizens be afforded a fair, equal and genuine opportunity to contribute to the process.

This includes the ability to present views freely, without intimidation and to have submissions properly heard and considered. ERC emphasised that transparent procedures, adequate time allocation and non-discriminatory access are essential to ensuring the legitimacy of the consultation process. “Citizens must be able to express their views without fear, and processes must be clear and consistent across all venues,” the statement read.

[paywall]

Despite these expectations, ERC Africa reported limitations in how some hearings are being conducted. “Observers noted that participation and submissions in certain instances appeared to be largely controlled at the discretion of presiding officials, particularly the chairperson and members of the Parliamentary Committee,” the statement read. “There are indications that not all participants are being given the same opportunity to contribute, which undermines the principle of inclusivity.

“There are no clear and uniform guidelines governing the hearings. There are inconsistencies in how sessions are managed across different locations, risking disenfranchising some citizens and weakening confidence in the process.”

[/paywall]