Time to rethink corporal punishment

Yet, as we assess the current state of discipline in many schools, we must confront an uncomfortable reality: student delinquency appears to be spiralling beyond control. Reports of bullying, classroom disruption, open defiance of teachers, and even violence amongst students are increasingly common. Teachers, once regarded as authoritative figures capable of maintaining order, now often find themselves struggling to manage classrooms effectively.

Many educators quietly admit they feel stripped of meaningful disciplinary tools, left to rely on warnings and suspensions that frequently fail to reform delinquent behaviour. It is true that corporal punishment, in some instances, was misused and crossed the line into abuse. Those cases deserved condemnation and corrective action.

However, it is equally important to recognise that such instances were not necessarily representative of the bigger picture. Historically, corporal punishment functioned as a remedial measure a deterrent against habitual misbehavior and common nuisance among students. For generations, it instilled a clear understanding of consequences, reinforcing respect for authority and boundaries within the school environment.

[paywall]

The critical question, therefore, is not simply whether corporal punishment can be harmful but whether its complete removal has created a disciplinary vacuum. What changed? Why did a method that once maintained order become wholly unacceptable?

And more importantly, what viable alternatives have truly replaced it? As cases continue to threaten herds and rural livelihoods, one simple but critical action can make a powerful difference: strictly adhering to FMD regulations, including refraining from slaughtering cloven-hoofed animals.Cloven-hoofed animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats, and pigs, are highly susceptible to FMD. Slaughter, especially during outbreaks or restricted periods, significantly increases the risk of spreading the virus through…

[/paywall]