The impending leadership change at the US Federal Reserve, with Fed chair Jerome Powell due to step down in May, can become a material source of market disruption as we move toward the next election cycle. Until recently markets appeared relaxed about this risk, concentrating on potential successors and assuming institutional boundaries would hold. That confidence now looks misplaced.
What has changed is not simply the political backdrop but the environment in which monetary policy is being made. US President Donald Trump has shown an increasing willingness to act unilaterally, and pressure to reduce living costs is intensifying. Interest rates are an obvious political lever.
Commentary in the Economist and Financial Times has increasingly focused on the risk that the leadership transition becomes a vehicle for reshaping the Federal Reserve itself, bringing it into closer alignment with the US treasury department and the presidency. At that point the issue ceases to be about personalities and becomes one of institutional independence. The interplay between personalities is very much in evidence, as Powell, repeatedlypublicly chastisedby Trump for not lowering interest rates further and faster, has confirmed that the US justice department has served subpoenas on the Fed.
Read Full Article on Business Day
[paywall]
Reports indicate that prosecutors are threatening a possible criminal indictment tied to his testimony about the central bank’s headquarters renovation. The $2.5bn renovation of the central bank’s headquarters made headlines last year,becoming another bone of contentionbetween the Fed chair and the president, with Trump labelling the project excessively expensive. It is Powell’s denials of these claims in the middle of last year before the Senate banking committee that have now erupted into what Powell calls a politically motivated attempt to undermine the Fed’s independence.
While geopolitical tensions remain a supporting factor, gold increasingly appears to be acting as a hedge against institutional erosion and policy credibility rather than inflation alone. This recent legal and political scrutiny surrounding the Federal Reserve’s leadership underlines how much the operating environment has shifted. The central bank that markets have relied on for decades is now functioning under different constraints, and investors should not assume future leadership will be willing — or able — to respond forcefully to inflation pressures if they re-emerge.
A central bank that is reluctant to tighten policy in the face of rising inflation would represent a meaningful change in regime, not a temporary deviation. If such a shift were to occur, the adjustment would almost certainly begin in bond markets. Inflation expectations would rise, long-term yields would reprice higher, and volatility would spread into currencies and equities.
Recent analysis suggests bond markets are still not adequately pricing the possibility of a reconfigured Fed mandate, despite the inflationary bias such a change would imply. Gold’s behaviour is consistent with this assessment. In periods in which confidence in policy frameworks weakens, gold has historically served as a form of portfolio insurance rather than a return-seeking asset.
[/paywall]
