Testimony heard in the Pietermaritzburg High Court this week should trouble every South African. An 11-year-old child was required to describe how she begged armed men to spare her father’s life, only to be told, without emotion, that he was already dead. She was then forced to walk over bodies in her own home while searching for money.
There was nothing abstract about this violence. It was cruel, deliberate and dehumanising. No psychological report, no explanation of upbringing or personal hardship can soften what was done to this family, or erase the permanent harm inflicted on a child who will carry these memories for the rest of her life.
Sentencing in this matter takes place today. The court will consider mitigation, as it must. But society also has a legitimate expectation that the punishment reflects the gravity of the crime.
Read Full Article on The Witness
[paywall]
This was a calculated, brutal attack that left five people dead and a family shattered. Life imprisonment, without the prospect of parole, is the only sentence that recognises both the scale of the crime and the lasting damage to the victims. The recent release of a convicted murderer who had been sentenced to life imprisonment has left another family reeling.
They were not informed. They were not consulted. Instead, they were confronted with the reality that the person responsible for their loved one’s death was back in the community, living freely.
This is where the justice system begins to lose credibility. Rehabilitation is an important goal. Compassion has a place in sentencing and corrections.
But when cold-blooded killers are released after serving only a fraction of life sentences, justice is not seen to be done. For families who have lost fathers, husbands and brothers, it feels like abandonment by the state. South Africa must strike a balance.
We should remain humane. But we must also protect society and ensure that sentences mean what they say. Without that balance, deterrence collapses, and so does public trust.
[/paywall]
