The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has found that antenuptial contracts concluded after a customary marriage are legally valid. The judgment was delivered on Wednesday, 21 January, bringing clarity to the legal position governing matrimonial property regimes where couples enter into both customary and civil marriages. The case involved a couple identified as J.R.M (plaintiff) and V.V.C (defendant), who entered into a customary marriage on 5 August 2011.
At the time of their marriage, no antenuptial contract was concluded. This resulted in the marriage being in community of property, with both spouses acquiring equal, undivided shares in their “joint estate”. Several years later, on 19 February 2019, the couple signed an antenuptial contract.
The document stipulated that a civil marriage they intended to conclude in the future would be out of community of property, subject to the accrual system. The civil marriage was eventually concluded on 10 June 2021. The relationship subsequently deteriorated, with both parties stating that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and could not be restored.
Read Full Article on The Citizen
[paywall]
In court proceedings, J.R.M contended that it had always been the mutual intention of the parties for their marriage to be out of community of property and governed by the accrual system. A constitutional challenge against Section 10(2) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act was later launched.
[/paywall]
