Poor research produces poor conclusions, and when those conclusions are widely circulated, the damage can be significant. The recent claim that Pietermaritzburg is the “most dangerous city in the world” is a case in point. As reported byThe Witness, experts have challenged the index behind this label, pointing to serious flaws in how the data was collected, analysed and presented.
The ranking relied on selective crime statistics, unclear sources and the mixing of perception-based inputs with reported crime figures, without transparency or proper weighting. This is not how sound research is conducted. Proper research requires clearly defined indicators, verified primary data, consistent timeframes and meaningful comparisons across similar contexts.
Methodologies must be open to scrutiny, limitations must be acknowledged, and conclusions must be proportionate to the evidence. None of these basic standards were met. It must be stated clearly: Pietermaritzburg has a crime problem.
Read Full Article on The Witness
[paywall]
That reality is not in dispute and should not be minimised. Crime affects residents’ quality of life and remains a serious concern. However, Pietermaritzburg is not the crime capital of South Africa, nor is it the most dangerous city in the world.
Claims to that effect are false. Security expert Colin Davids has cautioned that indices built on weak or mixed data often reflect perception rather than fact. When such rankings are published without context, they distort reality and mislead the public.
The consequences are tangible. Investors and businesses may think twice about locating in the city. Skilled professionals and families may be discouraged from moving here.
Residents may experience unnecessary fear and anxiety, despite no sudden change in actual conditions. This is how misinformation harms local economies and social wellbeing. The response must include stronger media literacy, particularly among young people. They must be taught how to assess sources, question claims, understand basic research principles and recognise credible journalism.
[/paywall]
