Mitchum’s recent deodorant mishap reveals how even global brands can stumble when they forget the human touch—and the local heartbeat. The company attributed the problem to a change in a manufacturing process for a raw material, said it had reverted to the original process, and began working with retailers to pull affected stock. That context matters in Botswana because the brand enjoys strong word-of-mouth here, commands a premium price and has real loyalty.
Yet when a Botswana consumer recently posted photos of significant underarm irritation and shared a screenshot of Mitchum’s email reply, the exchange exposed a deeper issue than a faulty batch: a multinational operating across borders but responding without a local heartbeat. The customer-service response we saw opens with corporate boilerplate and quickly offers two replacement roll-ons. There is no first sentence asking if the consumer is okay, no instruction to stop using the product, no advice to wash the area, and no suggestion to seek medical care if symptoms persist.
In crisis communications, the sequence matters: care, then cause, then compensation. When a body-contact product is implicated in irritation, the duty of care is straightforward. The company should first advise immediate discontinuation, provide clear self-care instructions, capture batch details, and offer a refund before even thinking about compensation.
Read Full Article on The Gazette
[paywall]
Offering more deodorant to an injured consumer sends the wrong message. It suggests the company is centred on stock movement, not wellbeing. Mitchum publicly explained that the formula hadn’t changed but a process tweak had altered how the product interacted with some people’s skin.
The affected batches could be identified by batch codes, which was good technical transparency. But the brand’s published notices and FAQs were framed for South African, UK, and Irish audiences. The South African statement directed people to an SA toll-free number—none of which helped a shopper in Gaborone determine whether their bottle was safe or where to go for help.
In Botswana, the basics went missing: a local hotline or WhatsApp number, a published batch list, guidance for retailers on refunds, and a clear reporting pathway. Without these, the affected customer—like many do when they feel unseen—went to Facebook. That isn’t bad behaviour; it’s a predictable outcome of an unmet need for care and clarity.
Consumers expected a Botswana statement, in English and Setswana, posted the day the story broke. They wanted a local WhatsApp line, a refund process at retailers, and small shelf cards explaining how to check batch codes. A refund first, then help for verified cases—such as a dermatologist reimbursement—would have been far more sensible than more roll-on.
None of this is extravagant; it’s basic reputation hygiene. Put the person first. A simple opening line checking on the consumer’s wellbeing and giving immediate safety guidance would have gone a long way. Make it easy to know whether a product is affected and what to do next, with batch lists and Botswana-specific instructions.
[/paywall]
