However, the images had been doctored by a young man who became vindictive after she repeatedly rebuffed his love attempts. Personal rejection quickly escalated into digital revenge, leaving Lindiwe shocked and exposed to strangers online. “When I saw the photos, my whole body went numb.
It felt like someone had stripped me in front of the world. How could someone be this cruel just because I said no?” she asks. Officers at Kabula Police Unit in Blantyre seemed unsure which law to use against the vengeful man.
Was it cyber-harassment under the Electronic Transactions and Cyber Security Act? A breach of personal data under the 2024 Data Protection Act? Or was circulation of sexual images outlawed by Section 137 of the Penal Code drafted long before the Internet existed?
[paywall]
Frustrated by sluggishness and uncertainty, Lindiwe and her ‘well connected’ relative contacted a friend at National Police Headquarters in Lilongwe who promised to “push the file”. Yet the case stalled at Blantyre Police Station where the file was referred. “Months passed with no arrest made,” she says.
“The police only cautioned the man to delete the vile posts and apologise to me,” Lindiwe narrates. Lindiwe is appalled that the matter withered in the bureaucratic haze. “I did everything I could do, but nothing much happened.
The system just gave up on me,” she laments. Many Malawian women and girls fall victim to digital-driven gender-based violence (GBV) but the perpetrators go scot-free as law enforcers seldom respond with urgency or clarity. The country’s evolving laws prohibit cybercrime, privacy violations, attacks on one’s modesty and other harmful practices, but Lindiwe’s case shows how they fail to curb and punish modern trends of digital violence.
The result is a patchwork of provisions that police officers must interpret and stretch to fit new, fast-moving forms of abuse from doctored photos to revenge porn to coordinated online harassment. In many cases, frontline responders remain unsure which law applies, what evidence is admissible or how far they can pursue a case originating from digital platforms such as Facebook, WhatsApp, or TikTok. The cybersecurity law of 2016 criminalises several online offences, but does not explicitly define or address image-based sexual abuse. The 2024 Data Protection Act offers stronger personal data safeguards, yet its enforcement mechanisms are still being built and tested.
[/paywall]
