The 18-member Pacific Islands Forum in the Solomon Islands concluded after leaders met behind closed doors on Friday, with the gathering’s key talking point being the “dialogue partners” who were controversially banned from attending this year. Alongside member states that include key players Australia and New Zealand, the gatherings are typically attended by dozens more countries as observers or partners. However, the Solomon Islands barred most of those partners from attending this year, sparking accusations that Honiara worked at Beijing’s behest to exclude long-time participant Taiwan.
The move prompted concern among fellow Pacific nations, three of whom — Marshall Islands, Palau and Tuvalu — still recognise Taipei. China counts the Solomon Islands among its closest partners and backers in the South Pacific, and they signed a secretive security pact in 2022. The dialogue partners issue required lengthy debate during Friday’s closed-door meeting, officials who were party to the leader discussions told AFP.
The official forum communique described the debate as a “robust exchange”. It said leaders agreed to a new framework in which states would apply to attend future summits as strategic partners. “It ensures that partnerships are structured, balanced, and accountable in relation to collective, regional political decision-making processes,” the communique said.
Continue reading this article from NewsDay.
[paywall]
New Zealand’s top diplomat Winston Peters told AFP last month it was “obvious” that outside forces were meddling in the summit. Peters, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong and other officials warned that banning dialogue partners could affect external aid to the Pacific. Palau President Surangel Whipps Jr also told AFP on Wednesday there had “absolutely” been outside meddling in the summit. “We should engage and be inclusive and have all partners here,” he said.
[/paywall]
Source: NewsDay
AllZimNews is an aggregation platform. We summarize and link to original sources to help readers discover news. Please visit the source link for the full article and context.
